Am Mi., 23. Jan. 2019 um 18:23 Uhr schrieb Jens Alfke <j...@mooseyard.com>:
> > > > On Jan 23, 2019, at 8:27 AM, Carsten Müncheberg < > carsten.muencheb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > A host application (which is a black box for me I cannot change) is > loading > > my plugin binaries which each have SQLite linked statically. When two > > plugins now access the same database file from the process of the host > > application none of the serialization mechanisms (file lock, mutex) > works, > > and my database file will get corrupted eventually. > > Build SQLite as a dynamic library, and link each of your plugins with it > dynamically. (You may need an installation process that copies the SQLite > library to a known location where each plugin can find it.) > Then there’s only one instance of SQLite, and locking should work properly. > > (And if the platform is macOS or iOS, consider using the built-in system > copy of SQLite instead of your own; that makes it even easier.) > > —Jens > > Yes, I was considering that, but wasn't sure if it would make a difference, so I thought I'd better ask first. Thanks. _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
