On 13 Jun 2019, at 10:01pm, Donald Shepherd <[email protected]> wrote:
> Given there's been numerous comments to the effect that SQLite now supports > -0.0 storing and retrieval other than printing, I'm curious which version > this was implemented in as I wouldn't mind removing my custom code when we > move to a SQLite version with this improvement. For auditing and probity reasons, I would store the values twice: once in a BLOB and another time in a REAL. When you need to look at the value you can choose which one to look at depending on why you're looking at it. _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list [email protected] http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
