Thanks, Jens. I got it. The benchmark sounds like it isn't a real benchmark, but a made-up scenario to exercise the Coz code. I've let go now. Doug
> -----Original Message----- > From: sqlite-users <sqlite-users-boun...@mailinglists.sqlite.org> > On Behalf Of Jens Alfke > Sent: Friday, January 03, 2020 10:58 PM > To: SQLite mailing list <sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org> > Cc: em...@cs.umass.edu; curtsin...@grinnell.edu > Subject: Re: [sqlite] FW: Questions about your "Performance > Matters" talk re SQLite > > > > On Jan 2, 2020, at 11:54 AM, Doug <dougf....@comcast.net> wrote: > > > > I know there has been a lot of talk about what can and cannot be > done with the C calling interface because of compatibility issues > and the myriad set of wrappers on various forms. I’m having a hard > time letting go of a possible 25% performance improvement. > > This was a heavily multithreaded benchmark (64 threads accessing > the same connection) on a very hefty server-class CPU. From Dr > Hipp’s results, it sounds like the speed up may be only in similar > situations, not to more normal SQLite usage. > > —Jens > _______________________________________________ > sqlite-users mailing list > sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org > http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite- > users _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
