On Mon, Jan 6, 2020 at 8:30 AM Dan Kennedy <danielk1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 6/1/63 13:44, Yongheng Chen wrote: > > We found a test case that hangs Sqlite: > > Thanks for all the work you've been doing on SQLite! > Indeed. But... The frequency of all these fuzzer related emails has reached a point IMHO that it's "polluting" a bit this ML. Especially since most times there's no follow (in the ML at least) to most of these messages. In another recent thread that mentioned another "fuzzer" (Manuel Rigger), I discovered his reports completely bypassed the ML and go straight to the official bug tracker, which AFAIK is not publicly writable, so Mr Rigger's quality work must have granted him the privilege to report directly via it. Thus I'd ask whether Mr Chen (or Mr Yongheng, I'm not sure) could similarly go off-list and directly to bug tracker? I have 37 separate threads starting Nov 22nd last year related to his fuzzer discoveries, for roughly the same number of threads related to all other topics, which effectively doubles this ML's traffic (in thread count, not message count). Thus my request. FWIW... --DD _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
