Hello Michael, I use these. I generate a library and statically link the library into the program.
/MD /W3 /GX /O2 /Ob2 /D "NDEBUG" /D "WIN32" /D "_LIB" /D "_AFXDLL" /Fp"Release/LibSqlite3.pch" /YX /Fo"Release/" /Fd"Release/" /FD /c Since SQLite seems to be I/O bound, I'm not sure the compiler matters that much. What I find is that performance on SCSI equipped machines is far superior to IDE. In some case I've had perfectly acceptable performance on my SCSI based system which becomes unusable when on my customers IDE based systems. Not SQlite's fault, IDE and SATA drives just aren't so hot. C Monday, January 9, 2006, 3:26:53 PM, you wrote: MS> Hi, MS> which VC6 options to use for a very fast sqlite dll? MS> Any /D except NDEBUG? MS> /nologo /MT /W3 /GX /O2 /D "WIN32" /D "NDEBUG" /D MS> "_WINDOWS" /D "_MBCS" /D "_USRDLL" MS> Is there another C compiler that generates faster executables on MS> windows? MS> Michael -- Best regards, Teg mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
