Glenn, I certainly would, but sadly this is for Win32 too.
Cheers, Steve -----Original Message----- From: Glenn McAllister [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 15 February 2006 16:45 To: sqlite-users@sqlite.org Subject: Re: [sqlite] Shared Memory Question This is likely a naive response, but on Linux have you thought using /dev/shm? It's a tmpfs ramdisk that is needed by POSIX shared memory calls shm_open and shm_unlink in glibc 2.2 and above. It grows and shrinks as required and uses almost no memory if it's never populated with files. As a simple test I created /dev/shm/test.d using sqlite3, created a simple table and populated it with a couple of rows of data. I connected to the database from another sqlite instance, and I was able to read the data just fine. After closing down both instances the test database was still there (no surprise, it's a filesystem after all). Dunno if that helps any. Glenn McAllister SOMA Networks, Inc. Drew, Stephen wrote: > Hello all, > > An interesting use of the in-memory SQLite database would be to use it > in shared memory and have the data shared between applications but > stored once.
