On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 01:13:19AM +0200, Ulrich Schöbel wrote: > I tried the 10 reps expecting even more. Then came the surprise: > only 67 microsecs. > > My first feeling was, something like a busy disk or so came > in just when I tried the 100 reps. But the results were reproducible, > deviating only by a few microseconds.
Perhaps your timing harness simply can't get accurate results at a mere 10 repetitions? -- Nathaniel -- Eternity is very long, especially towards the end. -- Woody Allen
