--- Jay Sprenkle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 4/28/06, Joe Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > No, exactly the opposite.
> > I want to expose my data structures and methods to the SQLite engine
> > to leverage its advanced ad-hoc querying abilities without the need
> > to commit my data to the database.
> 
> Ah. I assume the data will get saved eventually,
> so doesn't this simplify to a cached database?

The data in the case I described is all transient, but stored in
my application's memory in a very dense format with various C
functions to extract individual fields. To mirror that 
same data to conventional SQLite tables - even in an in-memory 
database - would easily make my server's memory footprint ten
times bigger. This is why the Virtual Table Proposal is so 
useful - in my opinion, much more useful than full-text-search 
which it was inspired by.  :-)


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

Reply via email to