I have to agree as well - Quite frequently I am just too busy to read
the list, other times I get a wealth of information from the list.  I
would hate to get unsubscribed because I was too busy to reply to a
message.  Plus, I archive all of my messages in the list so I can search
for previous information.  I may not read some posts right away, but
they do serve a useful purpose for me later down the road.

Being placed on a moderated status would be fine in my opinion, as
described by Eric, for new or infrequent posters.

Bob

-----Original Message-----
From: Eric Scouten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2006 10:26 AM
To: sqlite-users@sqlite.org
Subject: Re: [sqlite] Purging the mailing list roles. Was: Please
Restore Your Account Access

I agree with Jay. I'd hate to have to respond to an e-mail ping every  
so often just to continue reading the list.

On the other hand, I wouldn't mind terribly if I got placed on  
"moderated" status (i.e. had to go through a verification step in  
order to *post* to the list) if I were either (a) new to the list, or  
(b) hadn't posted in a while.

-Eric



On 30 May 2006, at 07:57, Jay Sprenkle wrote:

> On 5/30/06, Eugene Wee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Basically, what I imagined from DRH's original proposal was that  
>> accounts that
>> have not sent out mails after some period of time would receive an  
>> email
>> informing them that they will be unsubscribed unless they send a  
>> mail to the
>> mailing list, or they reply to this notification email, within  
>> some (short)
>> period of time.
>>
>> I have qualms about asking people to click on a link, since it may  
>> look like a
>> bogus email in which the link will take them elsewhere. You know,  
>> like one of
>> those "your account has expired, click on this link to renew" spam  
>> emails.
>
> I wouldn't want a lot of "I want to stay on the list" mail spamming  
> the list.
>
> You could sign up an autoresponder email account (like paypal) and  
> it would stay
> signed up forever. It would always respond to the query email with a
> reply including
> the original text of the message. You'd need to set it up so they had
> to reply to a
> different email account than the one to send the query mail.

Reply via email to