Brannon: Thank you for your thoughts. To be clear, the 'optimize for speed' setting in MY release is actually slower than MY debug version - I know nothing about Ralf's settings. That issue is separate from SQLiteSpy - I didn't mean to conflate them. And the issue is not which version of VS I'm using. If I simply put a 'return 0' in my callback, the time is within 2%. Thus, I am timing the dll only and I am using the pre-compiled version, not a VS 6 compiled version. Ralf is compiling his own version, in Borland, and gets 2.5 times my speed. Therefore, I believe the speed difference lies in the differences between the two compiled versions. Michael
- [sqlite] SQLiteSpy vs. SQLite.dll speed comparison michael cuthbertson
- RE: [sqlite] SQLiteSpy vs. SQLite.dll speed compa... Brannon King
- RE: [sqlite] SQLiteSpy vs. SQLite.dll speed compa... Shields, Daniel
- RE: [sqlite] SQLiteSpy vs. SQLite.dll speed compa... michael cuthbertson
- RE: [sqlite] SQLiteSpy vs. SQLite.dll speed c... Christian Smith
- [sqlite] SQLiteSpy - new topic Hartwig Wiesmann
- Re: [sqlite] SQLiteSpy - new topic Will Leshner
- Re: [sqlite] SQLiteSpy - new top... Jens Miltner
- [sqlite] Is BETWEEN faster t... Hartwig Wiesmann
- Re: [sqlite] Is BETWEEN ... Cory Nelson
- Re: [sqlite] Is BETWEEN ... Jay Sprenkle
- Re: [sqlite] SQLiteSpy - new... Hartwig Wiesmann
- RE: [sqlite] SQLiteSpy vs. SQLite.dll speed compa... michael cuthbertson
- RE: [sqlite] SQLiteSpy vs. SQLite.dll speed compa... Shields, Daniel

