At 09:34 01/12/2006, you wrote:
Hi there,

we are on an challanging project with very high requirements on performance.
When doing some debugging we discover, that the sqlite method for creating
an memory-based database is much slower than using e.g /dev/shm on linux or
/tempfs on solaris. (We have measured an 20min performance advantage for the
/dev/shm style on a batch run which takes 70min with :memory: and just 49min
using /dev/shm.
Because our project needs to be ported to windows - the /dev/shm is not an
option - because win2000 does not support any temporary memory based file
system. But beside that, we guess, that there will be a possiblity to tune
:memory: or we belief, that we to something wrong when using :memory: (for
example pragma page_size ...).
Is there any body who can give us some advises to tune up our :memory:
database to become as fast as the /dev/shm alternativ?

Thanks
roland

On our project we desisted to use :memory: databases, only a ram disk file system. From time to time make a snapshot to hard disk or other persistent medium.

In windows i suppouse you can make a ram disk using malloc and copy there your database file, set the pragma for temporary files to memory and disable journaling. Make a new io routines access based on windows, open/close, write/read etc... for access your memory malloc ram disk. Again, from time to time stop reads/writes to database and save it to disk.

HTH


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scientists have shown that the moon is moving away at a tiny yet measurable distance from the earth every year. If you do the math, you can calculate that 85 million years ago the moon was orbiting the earth at a distance of about 35 feet from the earth's surface. This would explain the death of the dinosaurs. The tallest ones, anyway.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to