Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 07:36:10PM +0200: DragonK wrote:
> On 2/7/07, Teg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >Hello ohadp,
> >
> >Well, my experience is, particularly when it's users using it and not
> >a personal project, that corruption happens fairly frequently when you
> >use this pragma. That's why I don't use it any more in my production
> >code.
> >
> >Transactions are far safer and fast too.
> >
> >Indeed, transactions are safer.
> 
> But I wonder, why did you experienced corruption with this pragma? Was it
> because of crashes of the OS or the application? Or are there other factors
> which can corrupt the data if not syncing ? As I understood from the
> documentation, the only thing that can corrupt data when using this pragma
> are crashes and power failures.

Hello,

If you don't care of corruption on crashes and power failures,
you can modify sqlite to write your temporary '-journal' files
in a ramfs mount directory.

DB file: /opt/sqlite/mydb
Journal in smtg like: /ramfs/opt#sqlite#mydb-journal

--
Guillaume FOUGNIES
Eulerian Technologies

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to