Anyone thoughts?
ken-33 wrote:
>
> Question for the list,
>
> I'd like to optimize my code, using the following pseudo code as an
> example.
>
> ===================================
> int i = 0 ;
> char str[20];
>
> sqlite3_prepare_v2( "insert into t1 values (?,?)" )
> sqlite3_bind_int ( i )
> sqlite3_bind_text(str)
>
> BEGIN TRANSACTION
> For (i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
> sqlite3_step ( );
> sqlite3_reset( )
> }
> COMMIT TRANSACTION
> ======================================
>
> However, the above code will fail to insert the values for i in the loop.
> It will only insert the value 0, since that was the binding value...
>
> An enhancement request would be to allow the user to bind the address to
> the statement objects. This would be a huge benefit from the standpoint
> of fewer function calls to sqlite3_bind in the inside loop.
>
> So maybe the following API:
>
> sqlite3_pbind_int(sqlite3_stmt *, int, int * );
> sqlite3_pbind_int64(sqlite3_stmt *, int, long long int * );
> sqlite3_pbind_double(sqlite3_stmt *, int, dobule *);
> sqlite3_pbind_text(sqlite3_stmt, int, const char *, int *,
> void(*)(void*));
> notice the text takes a pointer to the length...
> sqlite3_pbind_blob(sqlite3_stmt*, int, const char *, int *,
> void(*)(void*));
>
> Concept of SQLITE_STATIC vs SQLITE_TRANSIENT is implied that all data is
> SQLITE_STATIC.
>
> Regards,
> Ken
>
>
>
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/API-enhancement-tf3405347.html#a9562311
Sent from the SQLite mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
