However, it would be too time consuming to serialize every call to
sqlite3_step(), so I wonder whether it can be called in another
thread.
This almost immediately raises
"library routine called out of sequence". It occurs as soon as the
processing of A and B overlap, that means A is preparing statement #2
while B is still executing #1.
Have you tried using Mutex or some other way to prevevent really
simultaneous calling of SQLite methods? My guess that it should work
well then, but I haven't tried it myself...
Yes I did the same experiment with a lock that made thread A wait
until B was finished. So actually only one thread can be active at
the time. I don't see how the outcome of this experiment can be of
any interest, as there is no time reduction any longer. But your
guess is right that, it works.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
