While its difficult to tell what the problem statement (or context) is, but the ingrediants like HTTP and POST spells SOAP.
-----Original Message----- From: Gilles Ganault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2007 4:32 PM To: sqlite-users@sqlite.org Subject: Re: [sqlite] Recommend server for Windows? At 11:20 19/06/2007 -0400, Clay Dowling wrote: >I'm going to recommend PostgreSQL. Thanks for the idea, but if possible, we'd rather something really basic, typically a single EXE. Besides, using eg. PostgreSQL would require rewriting our application. I went through the list of servers on the wiki, and the following solutions look interesting: http://users.libero.it/irwin/ : uSQLiteServer - An SQLite network wrapper http://www.oneledger.co.uk/sql4sockets.html dhRPCServer + dhSQLite-COM-Wrapper http://www.thecommon.net/8.html http://www.protracksource.com/node/42 : "SQLite Server is a free database server that is the central data store for Pro Track Source Connected. It comes with your purchase of Pro Track Source Connected, but we also offer it here for a free download in case you have lost it." (CHECK if server can be used with any SQLite client) => BTW, I though of a simple solution: a web-like server process that uses HTTP for the protocol, and commands are sent with the POST method. HTTP is tried and true, and since we use TCP, the server can be configured to only accept a single connection at once, taking care of concurrency. Does someone know if something like this has been done? Thank you. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ----- To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ----- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
