> > What you described about the locking is correct. The threading isn't > strictly relevant; locking is done on a per-connection basis, not > per-thread. >
Yes, I think this was what was missed in our application's original implementation; it was not fully appreciated that locking was per-connection as opposed to per-thread. Explains a lot of interesting issues! This certainly gives the green light to go ahead with a fix. Thanks for the help. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
