Great idea! Why don't we give them little printable chits for free chips and beer as well?!
Just the facts m'am. -- Jack Webb > -----Original Message----- > From: John Stanton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, November 09, 2007 5:51 PM > To: sqlite-users@sqlite.org > Subject: Re: [sqlite] Suggests for improving the SQLite website > > > James Dennett wrote: > > Joe Wilson wrote: > > > >> --- "Samuel R. Neff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> I hope this doesn't offend, but perhaps the best solution is to > >> outsource > >>> the website to someone or a company that specializes in > websites and > >> design > >>> (with your stated simplicity goals in mind of course). > We certainly > >>> wouldn't want a graphic designer hacking away at the > SQLite engine, > > so > >> isn't > >>> the reverse also true? > >>> > >>> Sam > >> +1 > >> > >> Also, non-technical people would be a better judge of which website > >> design is appealing. > > > > Appealing *to* non-technical people? Why would a website > on an embedded > > database wish to appeal primarily to such an audience? I'd think it > > would be best to present information in a way that appeals > to its likely > > viewers. > > > > -- James > > > > How about having adding a social networking capability so that > non-technical people will have a reason to use the website. > You cannot > expect to attract them with a frugal and highly functional embedded > database library. > > -------------------------------------------------------------- > --------------- > To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -------------------------------------------------------------- > --------------- > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
