Grzegorz Makarewicz wrote:
Michael Scharf wrote:
* Somebody please suggest a better tag line - something
better than "The World's Most Widely
Used SQL Database".
I really like this tag line! However, it would be great if
there would be a link with some information that supports/explains
this statement. Anybody could say "The World's Most XXX".
In my opinion threads are very usefully within limited environments
where computation can be spitted by program logic or environments where
forking isn't possible.
Most SQL engines (server part) are using this point of view, but for
databases like SQLite - this should be irrelevant.
mak
PS
I - personally wouldn't see sqlite as client-server database -
oracle is much better, mssql too.
Embedded database with acid transactions - this is the market gap.
mak
We use Sqlite embedded in an application server as a client-server
database and it performs very well and is rock solid. On a value basis
it is markedly superior to both Oracle and MSsql. Sqlite wins in ease
of use and maintenance, overhead, footprint and overall cost of usage
making it a more productive tool.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
