On Tue, 22 Jan 2008 14:19:10 -0800, Scott Hess wrote
> Hmm.  I think the current behaviour is because the obvious result for
> this query would be the set of all documents with the documents
> matching each of the negated terms removed.

I disagree that this is the obvious result.  Searching for empty string yields
no results, so adding a constraint on top of that should also yield no
results.  But if searching for empty string yielded all rows, I would agree
with you that it is the obvious result.

> In the current system, calculating the set of all documents isn't 
> convenient, so since this couldn't be supported, it's an error.

Then how does "select * from my_fts3_table" work?

-- 
Andy Goth | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | http://andy.junkdrome.org/


-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to