Hi, Daniel Colchete: Thank you very much, very useful information for me! regards ye
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 3:51 PM, Daniel van Ham Colchete <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > ye, > > at the fifth question of the SQLite FAQ, at > http://www.sqlite.org/faq.html, it is explained why using a sqlite file > by multiple nodes over a network with a NFS filesystem is not a good > idea. I would avoid it although the FAQ does not say 'it does not work', > it only says 'it might not work'. > > You might want to take a look at GlusterFS (www.glusterfs.org), it's a > clustered filesystem that works well with fcntl() (the locking system). > If you need a smaller latency, it will also work with infiniband. > > Best regards, > Daniel Colchete > > ye wrote: > > Hi, Igor: > > Thanks for reply! > > Yes, I just noticed the sqlite data file is nothing but a empty file. > > Thanks! > > About the remote visit, if the sqlite data file is created on a NFS, will > > the remote visiting process be considered as a equal local process? > > > > regards > > ye > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > sqlite-users mailing list > sqlite-users@sqlite.org > http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users > -- Ye Huang, Department of Informatics University of Fribourg / Pérolles 2 - Bld de Pérolles 90 1700 Fribourg, Switzerland e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://diuf.unifr.ch/people/huangy/ Office: +41 26 429 65 95 _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
