Marian Aldenhövel wrote: > Hi, > > >> FWIW, I ran your simple example on a Windows XP machine through the Ruby >> driver and got 8 seconds for the update. >> > > Scaling that down to the hardware being used, which is a 486-clone with > a 16bit bus showing as running at 31 BogoMIPS in linux (don't know the > clockspeed), propably kills the idea of using SQLite. > > Given SQLites performance data as published there propably also is no > suitable replacement that would allow me to use nice SQL. > > <sniff> >
That is a tad over 36,000 b-tree nodes per second. What are your actual performance requirements? John _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
