On Tue, 21 Jul 2009 08:57:25 -0500, "Jay A. Kreibich" <j...@kreibi.ch> wrote:
>On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 10:57:33PM +0200, Kees Nuyt scratched on the wall: >> Think Lite. > > I'm trying. That's why I didn't suggest just rolling it into > the main code. By having it as a module you can load it (or not) and > use it (or not) as needed. Those that feel they have a strong need > to have the code in the engine can have it, but those of use that > think it is overkill can leave it out. Heck, having it as a module > would let you remove it from sqlite3.... Yes, that's a nice solution. Actually it wasn't so smart of me to react to your previous posting, because I mostly agree with you on your balanced opinions and proposed solutions. I rather meant to oppose to the ever threatening featuritis and sometimes misplaced expectations of some overly enthousiastic SQLiters. [cut for brevity, man, you can write, I'm jealous] Regards, -- ( Kees Nuyt ) c[_] _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
