A.J.Millan wrote: > In fact, actually I'm using the new style querys, and my question was > an attempt to: > > * Make sure there was no 16-bit version of the sqlite3_get_table at > function -perhaps it would be a good idea to include it in the > standard API. The reason is the same who advised include the current > version.
sqlite3_get_table is included for backward compatibility, to ease porting applications written for SQLite 2.x. But SQLite 2.x didn't have sqlite3_get_table16, so there's no reason to add it now. New applications should use prepared statements instead. > * Check if someone had previously resolved the same problem for not > changing the logic of my application in the many points that I use the > function. If you believe you really need it for some reason, you can write your own. There's no black magic in sqlite3_get_table, it uses public API only. The source code is freely available in SQLite distribution. Igor Tandetnik _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list [email protected] http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
