> I would just like to reduce some memory > overhead as well as use those keywords instead of creating integer > fields using 0 and 1.
I'm curious, what "memory overhead" do you think will be reduced in case of using booleans instead of integers? Pavel On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 5:44 PM, Shaun Seckman (Firaxis)<shaun.seck...@firaxis.com> wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I'm just curious how difficult it would be to add > support for booleans in SQLite. This would most likely involve adding a > new type affinity as well as adding "true" and "false" keywords to the > lexer. There's much more that could be done but I'm just looking for > rudimentary support. > > > > I understand that ANSI C doesn't have native support for > booleans and that's fine, I would just like to reduce some memory > overhead as well as use those keywords instead of creating integer > fields using 0 and 1. > > > > -Shaun > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > sqlite-users mailing list > sqlite-users@sqlite.org > http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users > _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
