On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 12:58 AM, Dennis Volodomanov<denn...@conceiva.com> wrote:
> Thank you for the quick replies and sorry for not being too clear.
>
> I will try to state the problem more clearly, without my own attempts to 
> solve it, as they are incorrect anyway.
>
> The simplified schemas again:
>
> CREATE TABLE TABLEA ( ID INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, IDB INTEGER, IDC INTEGER, IDD 
> INTEGER );
> CREATE TABLE TABLEB ( ID INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, DATA );
> CREATE TABLE TABLEC ( ID INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, DATA );
> CREATE TABLE TABLED ( ID INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, DATA );
>
> And some sample data:
>
> TABLEA
> 1|0|0|0
> 2|1|0|0
> 3|2|1|1
> 4|0|1|2
> 5|1|2|0
> 6|3|1|3
>
> TABLEB, TABLEC, TABLED
> 1|A
> 2|B
> 3|C
>
> The problem is that I need to grab rows from TABLEB where the ID of that row 
> appears in TABLEA, at the same time satisfying other conditions such as IDC 
> of that row also has multiple values (IDC=1 OR IDC=2, for example).
>
> So, given:
>
> IDC=1 AND (IDD=1 OR IDD=3)
>
> I need to get rows 2 and 3 from TABLEB.


SELECT * FROM TABLEB WHERE ID IN (
  SELECT IDB FROM TABLEA WHERE IDC = 1 AND IDD IN (1, 3)
)


>
> Hopefully this makes more sense :)
>
> Best regards,
>
>   Dennis
>
> _______________________________________________
> sqlite-users mailing list
> sqlite-users@sqlite.org
> http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
>



-- 
Puneet Kishor http://www.punkish.org
Carbon Model http://carbonmodel.org
Charter Member, Open Source Geospatial Foundation http://www.osgeo.org
Science Commons Fellow, http://sciencecommons.org/about/whoweare/kishor
Nelson Institute, UW-Madison http://www.nelson.wisc.edu
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Assertions are politics; backing up assertions with evidence is science
=======================================================================
Sent from Madison, WI, United States
_______________________________________________
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlite.org
http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users

Reply via email to