Question 1 is a very good question, why pay for a partial copy if you can use the full version for free?
Also, what is the sense of using SQLite database without SQL support? (this remember Clipper/dBase GOTO LOCATE APPEND...) I can't get the point... if you can't use a native SQLite in your platform, why do not use another pure-java DB? Just my 2 cents... -----Original Message----- From: sqlite-users-boun...@sqlite.org [mailto:sqlite-users-boun...@sqlite.org] On Behalf Of Kosenko Max Sent: quinta-feira, 17 de setembro de 2009 11:14 To: email@example.com Subject: Re: [sqlite] [ANN] SQLJet 1.0.0 released Alexander Kitaev-3 wrote: > > We're glad to announce that SQLJet 1.0.0 has been released and available > for download at http://sqljet.com/ web site. > Hi. Several questions: 1. Are there any real reasons for having dual-licensed commercial partial reimplementation of SQLite in Java? Any examples? 2. When do you expecting to have SQL API? 3. Are you targeting for having 100% SQLite unit-tests passes? 4. Have you ever thought about collaborating with and contributing to http://code.google.com/p/csharp-sqlite/ since it's easier to port C#->Java than C->Java? 5. Any benchmarks comparing to native? Thanks. Max. ----- Best Regards. Max Kosenko. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-ANN--SQLJet-1.0.0-released-tp25458690p25491910.html Sent from the SQLite mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list firstname.lastname@example.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list email@example.com http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users