On 21 Sep 2009, at 9:36pm, Fred Williams wrote: > would SQLite not work as the "back end" > for a client server (wrapper) implementation that did the multi > process (or > whatever) lock management up one level so to speak?
Great question. I don't know. It requires either in-depth knowledge of how SQLite works, or specialised understanding of how such database engines work and the common faults with them. I don't have either. Don't forget: if you're going to use SQLite as a back end system you can implement transactions-across-TCP/IP and many of those other things people want too. Simon. _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users