On 21 Sep 2009, at 9:36pm, Fred Williams wrote:

>  would SQLite not work as the "back end"
> for a client server (wrapper) implementation that did the multi  
> process (or
> whatever) lock management up one level so to speak?

Great question.  I don't know.  It requires either in-depth knowledge  
of how SQLite works, or specialised understanding of how such database  
engines work and the common faults with them.  I don't have either.

Don't forget: if you're going to use SQLite as a back end system you  
can implement transactions-across-TCP/IP and many of those other  
things people want too.

Simon.
_______________________________________________
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlite.org
http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users

Reply via email to