> Don't worry: we're all confused with MS wording! For what I understand > having also myself tried to sort out the question, is that there is a > line drawn: before XP unicode support included was nothing else than > UCS-2 (W2K). Xp and post-XP system include Unicode 5.1 and use UTF-16
> encoding. This is from 2005: > > http://blogs.msdn.com/michkap/archive/2005/05/11/416552.aspx Thanks for the link. That clarifies things a lot. So, for the OP, if you are targeting Win2k, it would be a good idea to use UCS-2, not UTF-16, with any wide API calls. XP and above should (according to Kaplan and Chen) support UTF-16 for API calls. John _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
