>I just don't want anyone saying "but >this one dude told me to replace all my structs with SQLite memory >tables."
Indeed that wouldn't be very clever SQLite promotion! >I think the best plan in this case would be to get a real language But, surprisingly this thing is a real language, with some limitations of course, easily worked around in most practical cases. The choice also has to take other considerations into the picture and, all in all, I came to look at it with less preconceived ideas. When you look closely, a number of language constructs found around are nothing more than syntatic sugar offered to laziness. >How could a man LIVE without arrays? Oh no, it has arrays up to 64 dimensions (which should be enough to represent real world data and beyond) and dynamic structures exist albeit not first class citizens. Simply no native associative arrays. _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
