Igor, you didn't understand my sentence, I said that I would be stupid to not use ICU as it is already used by sqlite... means I want to use ICU and nothing else, because it is used in sqlite.
BUT I find that the ICU extensions should provide a function to normalize a string, it would have me to not use ICU directly... anyway, I will do it, that's not a problem :-) relax, that's holidays soon :-P Best regards, Sylvain On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 11:00 PM, Igor Tandetnik <itandet...@mvps.org>wrote: > Sylvain Pointeau > <sylvain.point...@gmail.com> wrote: > > by the way, I will not use other thing than ICU to implement it > > because I > > already use it with sqlite then I would be really stupid to change > > again of > > API... don't you agree? > > No, I don't understand this point at all. SQLite uses fopen to open files > and malloc to allocate memory - does it mean it's stupid to ever use fopen > or malloc in a program that uses SQLite? Should one wait until SQLite > provides an API for opening a file or allocating memory? > > Just because SQLite uses ICU doesn't mean you can't also use ICU for some > additional functionality you need. > > Igor Tandetnik > > _______________________________________________ > sqlite-users mailing list > sqlite-users@sqlite.org > http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users > _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
