"Artur Reilin" <sql...@yuedream.de> schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:op.u5vno6hp1pq...@rear...
> If you are using something like an log system it > would be better in this way, but in apps like an > shop what wouldn't be so great. (thinking about > ebay with the bets and such..) Of course, but I think I made that already clear, that the approach should not to be misunderstood as a "general recommendation" - it really should be used only within smaller Apps, which don't need e.g. "stacked transactions", or "complex transactions which could fail" ... Apps which also only work singlethreaded within a single process ... ...the timer-based transaction-syncing then only an "easier applicable workaround" in environments which cannot - (or don't want to) make use of the more efficient working async-writer-thread implementation of the SQLite-engine). Olaf Schmidt _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
