On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 11:18:32AM -0800, Scott Hess scratched on the wall: > On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 5:18 PM, Jay A. Kreibich <j...@kreibi.ch> wrote:
> > ?While I have not tested this, I was under the impression that the > > ?journal file is very very small, as no modifications are made to the > > ?database, other than the final low-level copy (which is not a > > ?journaled operation). > AFAICT, the operation to copy the pages back _is_ journaled, and the > journal will get any pages which are overwritten in the front of the > main database. Taking a closer look at the comments in the code, I believe you are correct. That makes sense anyways, as there is still a need to be able to back-out. There are some comments in the code about how turning journaling off is slower than leaving it on, but I see now that those comments are for the temp database, not the original file. -j -- Jay A. Kreibich < J A Y @ K R E I B I.C H > "Our opponent is an alien starship packed with atomic bombs. We have a protractor." "I'll go home and see if I can scrounge up a ruler and a piece of string." --from Anathem by Neal Stephenson _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
