If "ch" is an unsigned char then how is the following unsafe:

     ch = (ch<0x80) ? tolower(ch) : ch

And why does it need to be changed to

    ch = (ch>='A' && ch<='Z') ? ch - 'A' + 'a' : ch;

There is only one such instance of code remaining in FTS3 (at
fts3_tokenizer1.c:196) but I want to understand what the issue is before I
change it.

On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 1:30 PM, Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
<phajdan...@chromium.org>wrote:

> On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 15:23, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. <phajdan...@chromium.org
> >wrote:
>
> > I'm attaching a suggested patch to fix locale-unsafe usage of tolower in
> > FTS code. The goal is to make Chromium closer to the upstream, so if you
> > have a better solution, that's great.
>
>
> Oh, I have just noticed that the mailing list removes all attachments. What
> is the best way to send patches then?
>
> By the way, any suggestions about the Chromium patch I linked to (
>
> http://src.chromium.org/viewvc/chrome/trunk/src/third_party/sqlite/safe-tolower.patch?view=markup
> )?
> It seems that it has somehow been fixed in fts3 code. I'm not yet very
> familiar with the SQLite codebase though, so could you point me to the
> fixes?
> _______________________________________________
> sqlite-users mailing list
> sqlite-users@sqlite.org
> http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
>



-- 
---------------------
D. Richard Hipp
d...@sqlite.org
_______________________________________________
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlite.org
http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users

Reply via email to