The problem is in Apple-contributed code to work with their NFS filesystem.
You can disable all of the Apple code by compiling with
-DSQLITE_ENABLE_LOCKING_STYLE=0

On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 10:03 AM, Jim Wilcoxson <pri...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Using the SQLite Encryption Edition rev 3.7.0.1, the latest released
> version, on OSX Tiger (10.4), results in an undefined reference to
> gethostuuid.  Is OSX 10.4 no longer supported?
>
> Thanks,
> Jim
> --
> HashBackup: easy onsite and offsite Unix backup
> http://sites.google.com/site/hashbackup
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 9:01 PM, Richard Hipp <d...@sqlite.org> wrote:
>
> > SQLite version 3.7.2 is now available on the SQLite website:
> > http://www.sqlite.org/
> >
> > SQLite version 3.7.2 fixes a single bug that was discovered just hours
> > after
> > the release of 3.7.1.  The bug can result in corruption of the database
> > free-list after an incremental vacuum.  The bug had nothing whatsoever to
> > do
> > with SQLite version 3.7.1 or any other recent release.  The problem had
> > been
> > in the code for over a year, since version 3.6.16.  The discovery of the
> > problem so soon after the release of version 3.7.1 was purely
> coincidental.
> >
> > The bug fixed in 3.7.2 can result in database corruption.  However, the
> > corruption caused by this bug can almost always be fixed simply by
> running
> > VACUUM on the database.  And the corruption will only occur in an
> > incrementally vacuumed database which at some point in time contains
> > hundreds of unused pages which are slowly released back to the operating
> > system by multiple calls to the incremental_vacuum PRAGMA.  Even then,
> one
> > must be particularly unlucky to hit the right combination of freed pages
> in
> > order to trigger the bug.  Hence the problem is quite obscure and was not
> > noticed for over a year.
> >
> > Hundreds of lines of code where changed for version 3.7.2, but most of
> > those
> > changes were to test procedures.  As is the custom with SQLite, not only
> > was
> > the specific bug fixed, but new tests where put in place to detect and
> > prevent similar kinds of bugs elsewhere in the code.  We believe that one
> > should not just fix the bug, but also fix the process that generated the
> > bug. The only 4 working lines of code were changed for version 3.7.2:
> >
> >
> > http://www.sqlite.org/src/fdiff?v1=2dff4076d3c994dc&v2=5047fb303cdf6806
> >
> > Special thanks to Filip Navara for finding and reporting the problem with
> > incremental vacuum.
> >
> > Please report any other problems to the sqlite-users@sqlite.org mailing
> > list, or directly to me.  Thanks.
> >
> > --
> > D. Richard Hipp
> > d...@sqlite.org
> > _______________________________________________
> > sqlite-users mailing list
> > sqlite-users@sqlite.org
> > http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
> >
> _______________________________________________
> sqlite-users mailing list
> sqlite-users@sqlite.org
> http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
>



-- 
D. Richard Hipp
d...@sqlite.org
_______________________________________________
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlite.org
http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users

Reply via email to