On Oct 4, 2010, at 14:46, Jay A. Kreibich wrote:
> If you're treating the threads independently, each with their own
> database connections, you should be safe with =2 ("multithread").
> That provides less protection than =1 ("serialized"), but it is also
> faster. Continued from above:
>
> When compiled with SQLITE_THREADSAFE=2, SQLite can be used in a
> multithreaded program so long as no two threads attempt to use
> the same database connection at the same time.
I did read that, but I didn't quite understand what the global state is
that will be accessed between otherwise independent threads. Reading the code
makes that a bit more clear.
I was mainly wondering if there was a difference between having two
entirely independent threads accessing two entirely independent databases, or
if =2 was for concurrent access to a single database only.
It sounds like the answer is ``just do it anyway.''
Thanks.
--
Dustin Sallings
_______________________________________________
sqlite-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
