On 26 Dec 2010, at 10:22pm, Drake Wilson wrote:

> I think this is part of the disconnect.  I don't get the feeling that
> the SQLite documentation is intended for people who have little or no
> SQL background, but rather as a reference for those who are already
> familiar with SQL relational databases, but not SQLite particularly.

This is correct.  Teaching people how to use SQL efficiently is not a task that 
the SQLite team have taken on.  There are many web pages and books to teach 
that.

On the other hand, almost nobody who uses SQL has read the specification 
document for SQL.  And frankly none of them should have to: it's easier to 
understand SQL than the specification for SQL.  So using a technical term that 
exists in the specification may be useful for the SQLite developers, but may 
mean nothing to the casual SQL user reading the SQLite documentation.

Simon.

_______________________________________________
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlite.org
http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users

Reply via email to