On 21 Feb 2011, at 5:56am, Dan Kennedy wrote: > WAL file growth has (apparently) been a problem for people with > really busy systems. But so far it has been the actual size of > the file on disk that bothers them, not the memory mapped bit.
If that's what you think is raising concern then fine, someone needs to write something about that. But looking at the actual posts to this list gives me questions about reported memory-usage. Simon. _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users