Hi Udon,

to come to an possibly productive end here: if you think an amd64 compilation 
would be useful to you (I do doubt that though :(, drop me a note and I will 
fire up a compiler run on one of my servers, and tar the results.

/eno


> 
> @eno
> I'm sure RPMs are really cool. But previously I just included all the dynamic 
> libraries in a directory so LabVIEW knew where to find them and everything 
> worked fine. The end user just unzipped the API to a directory and started 
> developing. No "download this, then do that" or "oh and by the way you need 
> this 
> and also that is a dependency". Simple for the end-user and for me (I just 
> need 
> to zip a directory). From what people tell me, unlike the MAC, SQlite isn't 
> part 
> of any default install in linux and they would have to do as you suggest and 
> download something (and I would have to support that installation too-which I 
> cannot). Additionally, thAny solution that involves linux is really off the 
> menu. It needs to be a cross-compile or I just drop linux support. But at 
> least 
> I can then say I have made an effort for linux users - even though I'm not 
> one 
> myself.
> 
> The platform is whatever the SQLite from sqlite.org was compiled for 
> (preferably 
> with the aforementioned switches, but if that's too hard; then with default). 
> The windows and VX works libraries have those defines, but if it's not 
> possible, 
> then linux users won't get full text search and they'll have to use low level 
> functions (rather than the easy API) for foreign keys. They'll just have to 
> live 
> with it as a limitation in linux as MAC users do.
> 
> Regards
> Udon


_______________________________________________
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlite.org
http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users

Reply via email to