Dave please take a look at this blog post: http://www.sqlabs.com/blog/?p=51 -- Marco Bambini http://www.sqlabs.com
On Apr 28, 2011, at 9:36 PM, Dave Hayden wrote: > When the VACUUM feature was added I took a look at using it to keep database > file sizes down, but discovered that it changed rowids and messed up my > references between tables (or what I gather the database people call "foreign > keys"). I'm playing around with this again and it looks like rowids aren't > affected if I have an INTEGER PRIMARY KEY column, but I don't want to rebuild > the existing tables if I don't have to. > > After more poking, it appears that rowids might not be changed by a vacuum if > I have an index on the table. Is this true? If so, is it something I can rely > on going forward? > > Thanks! > -Dave > > _______________________________________________ > sqlite-users mailing list > sqlite-users@sqlite.org > http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
