Matthew L. Creech <mlcre...@gmail.com> писал(а) в своём письме Sat, 04 Jun 2011 02:26:09 +0600:
> Coincidentally, I happened to be reading over this page just earlier today: > > http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Why_PostgreSQL_Instead_of_MySQL_2009 > > Obviously a bit biased toward PostgreSQL (since it's hosted there), > but it points out some fairly specific differences in features, > performance, etc. (I have no personal experience either way, but was > just curious myself). Posting stuff like that on your site is pathetic >:( If you build a nice DBMS, you should work on how to make it even better, not on how to slander different DBMSes. I work with MySQL for years, both in small and medium-loaded applications, and it works like a charm for me. Extremely fast, extremely reliable, full of nice features like native fulltext support. If you need a non-transactional (atomic), very fast, reliable and simple server-like DBMS, then MySQL+MyISAM would suit you perfectly. If you need transactions (although in most of the web cases you don't need them), you can use InnoDB. And if your application is heavy, then I guess Oracle would be a better choice for you. After reading this article, I'm starting to disrespect Postgre :( The article is very questionable in places. Yes, SQLite documentation also has comparisons against MySQL, but it never offends it. Regards, Serge _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
