On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 6:22 PM, Stephan Wehner <stephanweh...@gmail.com> wrote: > There are some benchmark's at > http://leveldb.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/doc/benchmark.html > > I don't have anything to point to, but I thought sqlite3 does better > than stated there. > > In particular, 26,900 sequential writes per second and 420 random writes > per second from section "1. Baseline Performance" look suspicious. >
Wow, that's a bad mark for sqlite; I dunno it's somewhat misleading, because I do know that if I use sqlite as a logging database, and stream data to it it's kinda slow, and works better if I bunch up inserts with multiple value sets. But, enabling transactions, and doing the same thing, write speed goes way up. And now with WAL journal, it might affect that speed test also in auto transact mode especially > What you say? > > Stephan > _______________________________________________ > sqlite-users mailing list > sqlite-users@sqlite.org > http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users > _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
