it makes me give up the idea of using a sqlite database for my embed file system...
2011/9/6 Stephan Beal <sgb...@googlemail.com> > On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 5:02 PM, Pero Mirko <peromi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > - BLOB data should be avoided along with the rest of smaller row data as > it > > seems to slow things down considerably, the smaller the row and the > simpler > > data structure - the better. > > > > To elaborate on this a tiny bit: if you have, e.g., a table called > "downloads" and it contains the fields (name, downloadCount, theBlob), and > you update the download count each time it is downloaded, someone on this > list once recommended to me that the blob be stored in a separate table > because updating the field requires copying the whole row (and thus the > overhead of the blob is disproportionately high, since we are copying it > but > not modifying it). > > -- > ----- stephan beal > http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/ > _______________________________________________ > sqlite-users mailing list > sqlite-users@sqlite.org > http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users > _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
