On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 06:56:50PM +0200, Stephan Beal scratched on the wall: > On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 6:47 PM, Jay A. Kreibich <j...@kreibi.ch> wrote: > > > On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 12:29:56PM +0800, ?????? scratched on the wall: > > > is there any limit about the data size? > > > > PRAGMA max_page_count should work on in-memory databases. > > Isn't there also the limitation that the maximum db size == the max memory > the system allocator can dole out, plus limitations imposed by the "bitness" > of the platform?
Well, yes... you need some place to put the data, and 32-bit systems do have inherent limits on the amount of memory they can address... real, virtual, or otherwise. > You can't (per my understanding) have a 10GB in-memory db > on a 32-bit machine (regardless of how much RAM it has), Correct. Although you could have a 10GB anonymous database, which is kind of like an in-memory/on-disk hybrid. > but you can have a 10GB on-storage db on that same machine. Assuming you have a storage device with at last 10 GB free, yes. -j -- Jay A. Kreibich < J A Y @ K R E I B I.C H > "Intelligence is like underwear: it is important that you have it, but showing it to the wrong people has the tendency to make them feel uncomfortable." -- Angela Johnson _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
