On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 5:36 AM, Jay A. Kreibich <j...@kreibi.ch> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 01:33:31PM +0200, Gert Corthout scratched on the wall:
>> we have a database that only performs insert statements on a table
>> (database contains only this table), is it in this case a good idea
>> to reduce the cache size to, say, 5?
>
>  No, that would be a bad idea.  Smaller than the default 2000 might
>  work, but you don't want to go that small.

What Jay said.  I just wanted to additionally point out that making
the cache absurdly small gets into diminishing returns.  If you drop
to 100 you've already saved 95% of the potential cache size already
(though you might not have cut the ACTUAL usage that much).

-scott
_______________________________________________
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlite.org
http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users

Reply via email to