> I can't use WAL because it doesn't stop readers from reading. For this sort of synchronization you should use OS synchronization primitives, especially if you want to do that among different processes.
Pavel On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 5:11 PM, Harnek Manj <hm...@gemcomsoftware.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Should I use Shared-Cache in sqlite to have the exclusive table lock, so that > readers have to wait for the write operation to finish. I don't want the > complete database file locked while there is write operation. I can't use WAL > because it doesn't stop readers from reading. > > Thanks > Harnek > _______________________________________________ > sqlite-users mailing list > sqlite-users@sqlite.org > http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
