Hi Michael, That seems to be under either gpl/lgpl/apache licenses, which I cannot use in my project for various reasons. The reason I am so interested in SqLite is because it's public domain. I appreciate the tip though.
Kind regards, Philip Bennefall ----- Original Message ----- From: Black, Michael (IS) To: phi...@blastbay.com ; General Discussion of SQLite Database Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2012 9:03 PM Subject: Re: [sqlite] Full text search without full phrase matches Sounds to me like you want Lucene instead of SQLite http://lucene.apache.org/core/ Michael D. Black Senior Scientist Advanced Analytics Directorate Advanced GEOINT Solutions Operating Unit Northrop Grumman Information Systems ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ From: sqlite-users-boun...@sqlite.org [sqlite-users-boun...@sqlite.org] on behalf of Philip Bennefall [phi...@blastbay.com] Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2012 1:32 PM To: General Discussion of SQLite Database Subject: EXT :Re: [sqlite] Full text search without full phrase matches Hi Simon, The ordering is not really the issue I am having. That, I can do if I just get a result back that doesn't necessarily match all the keywords. In the query you showed as an example, all the keywords would still have to match in order for a row to be returned. The sorting is a separate problem that is not really that difficult once I get a smaller dataset. Then I can order it manually. The problem is that it only returns a match if every single word is present. I would like it to return matches if, say, mor than 2 or 3 of the specified keywords are found. Kind regards, Philip Bennefall ----- Original Message ----- From: "Simon Slavin" <slav...@bigfraud.org> To: "General Discussion of SQLite Database" <sqlite-users@sqlite.org> Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2012 8:24 PM Subject: Re: [sqlite] Full text search without full phrase matches On 14 Jun 2012, at 7:13pm, Philip Bennefall <phi...@blastbay.com> wrote: > That is unfortunate, if it is true that there's no way to accomplish this > with SqLite. To do just plain matching I can use an unordered hash map, so > I wouldn't need a database for that. The trouble with a string distance > function is that I can't really process the entire dataset with it. SqLite > technically has all the features I'm after, I just don't want it to > necessarily match all the words in a query. If I can get it to match all > as well as some, that would be enough. I could then do distancing on a > considerably smaller dataset which would be the result of the broader > SqLite search. > > So I guess my main question is, is there absolutely no way to match a > subset of the words in a query? Well, you could write that string distance function and add it to your copy of SQLite as an external function. Then you could do things like SELECT string_distance(theText, 'this new piece of text'), theText FROM oldChats WHERE string_distance(theText, 'this new piece of text') < 10 ORDER BY string_distance(theText, 'this new piece of text') (I don't know whether SQLite will optimise that to avoid executing the same function many times, or whether you can name a column and use that name to do the same thing yourself.) Here's the documentation for external functions: <http://www.sqlite.org/c3ref/create_function.html> Simon. _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
