Dear sirs,
My group is working with SQLITE Version 3.7 . .and the project has to do with
transformation of applications
to run on a Bare PC. On a CREATE TABLE, our traversal, in terms of
opcodes, inside sqlite3VdbeExec() is something like 1, 22, 25, 1, 23, 1a, 7,
24, 7, 24, 62, 27, 36, a, 37, 2b, 2b, a, 27, 15, 4a, etc. A parallel session
on Visual Studios gives the same sequence but has opcode 34 instead of the
highlighted 4a.
Can you, out of your expertise with SQLITE tell us what could cause this
difference,? Any clue would help. In
going from one opcode to another, what is there to watch for, that may alter
the opcode value, p1 value, p2 value
or p3 value? If at all possible, I would like to speak offline with some
developer in your group so I can describe a
few more of our observations - my cell is (973) 332 0997,
Best Regards,
RKKUZO
----- Forwarded Message -----
From: "Black, Michael (IS)" <michael.bla...@ngc.com>
To: u okafor <uo07...@yahoo.com>; "sqlite-users@sqlite.org"
<sqlite-users@sqlite.org>
Sent: Tuesday, January 3, 2012 10:22 AM
Subject: RE:Fw: [sqlite] Fw: A question on sqlite processing
Why don't you try the split yourself and see if it solves the problem and then
let us all know?
It sure sounds like file size could be the cause.
Michael D. Black
Senior Scientist
Advanced Analytics Directorate
Advanced GEOINT Solutions Operating Unit
Northrop Grumman Information Systems
________________________________
From: u okafor [uo07...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Monday, January 02, 2012 4:41 PM
To: sqlite-users@sqlite.org
Cc: Black, Michael (IS); d...@sqlite.org
Subject: EXT :Fw: [sqlite] Fw: A question on sqlite processing
Is that to say that the 'split on the source file' that is yet to be made is
the reason
for the branching described below (see highlighted below) - can you, please,
explain further, I am still lost? That question still remains a question,
please help . . .
And now, another . . if you don't mind . .
when I tried to set a breakpoint at the definition (in sqlite3.c file) of the
function,SQLITE_API
u8 state = 0; intsqlite3_complete(constchar*zSql){/* Current state, using
numbers defined in header comment */u8 token;
not currently be hit. No executable code is associated with this line. Possible
causes include: preprocessir directives or compiler/linker optimizations.
I would really like dislodge/remove as many of the preprocessor directives and
options for compiler/linker optimization as possible. Mine is a search
project;
I need to strip off the sophistication used all over to have just the bare
application.
Can you help me?
----- Forwarded Message -----
From: "Black, Michael (IS)" <michael.bla...@ngc.com>
To: u okafor <uo07...@yahoo.com>; General Discussion of SQLite Database
<sqlite-users@sqlite.org>
Sent: Friday, December 30, 2011 8:17 AM
Subject: RE:[sqlite] Fw: A question on sqlite processing
This was just answered in another chain. Visual Studio has a 64k limit on
source code files for the debugger (thanks Microsoft...a 16-bit
limit?...really!).
If you need to step into it use WinDbg
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/hardware/gg463009
Nobody has done a split on the source file yet to make it < 64k.
Michael D. Black
Senior Scientist
Advanced Analytics Directorate
Advanced GEOINT Solutions Operating Unit
Northrop Grumman Information Systems
________________________________
From: sqlite-users-boun...@sqlite.org [sqlite-users-boun...@sqlite.org] on
behalf of u okafor [uo07...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2011 3:24 PM
To: sqlite-users@sqlite.org
Subject: EXT :[sqlite] Fw: A question on sqlite processing
Dear sir,
I have built a project solution in Visual Studio environment (version 10) using
a free
amalgamation source down from SQLite website and I am debugging. My first
question is - when I invoke sqlite3_complete() out of the shell.c source file,
control
passes into the body of sqlite3PagerSetPageSize(Pager *pPager, ..) function, a
method defined in sqlite3.c file (rather than going to a function defined in
sqlite3.c
file as sqlite3_complete()). please explain this phenomenon and the reason
behind
it . . . it's a similar occurrence also with sqlite3_config.
It is consistent and obviously with a reason - only I don't know what that
reason is,
please help
Yours truly,
uzo okafor
----- Forwarded Message -----
From: Richard Hipp <d...@sqlite.org>
To: u okafor <uo07...@yahoo.com>
Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2011 8:45 PM
Subject: Re: A question on sqlite processing
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 7:26 PM, u okafor <uo07...@yahoo.com> wrote:
Dear sir,
>I am a research student who is currently using freely downloaded software from
>SQLite.
>I have a few questions and would appreciate if you can call me back @ (973)
>332 0997
>My questions are so simple, I promise . .
>uzo okafor
>
>
I am on travel. Questions to sqlite-users@sqlite.org will get answered quickly.
--
D. Richard Hipp
d...@sqlite.org
_______________________________________________
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlite.org
http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
/* Value of the next token */I was not allowed, a message showed (moemtarily)
that said 'The breakpoint will
_______________________________________________
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlite.org
http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
