On 19 Aug 2012, at 6:31pm, lukas <lukas.fellech...@gmx.net> wrote: > Simon Slavin <slavins@...> writes: > >> Using both versions can you tell us the results of >> >> SELECT sqlite_version(),sqlite_source_id() > > Results are exactly the same for both dlls: > > 3.7.13 > 2012-06-11 02:05:22 f5b5a13f7394dc143aa136f1d4faba6839eaa6dc
That's interesting and useful for use to know. > The inserts are also in a transaction block. Basically it looks like this: > > begin transaction > insert ... > insert... > update... <- fail > > So the transaction is already started and the db and journal files are opened. > But it also happens on the simple case: > > begin transaction > update... <- fail > > It does not make a difference if I use WAL or not, already tried disbling > that. Is there a chance that you simply have an UPDATE command with a bad syntax ? You say it works fine on one implementation of 3.7.13 but not the other ? I'm mystified by what you're seeing but I hope someone else can help. Simon. _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
