On 12/27/12 5:04 PM, Warren Young wrote: > On 12/27/2012 17:43, Daniel Colascione wrote: >> Yep: there was recently a long thread on the Cygwin mailing list >> about which mode to use for the official sqlite3 package: > > Yeah, I know, I was there. > > (Hello from the Cygwin SQLite package maintainer.)
Err, right. IIRC, I'd already posted a more abbreviated version of my analysis to that thread, so I figured the person to whom I was responding couldn't possibly have been there. :-) >> I hope you'll be able to fix this bug. > > In the end, building in Unix mode is the right thing. We just can't > safely do that right now. Right. > Until Cygwin gets the facilities that would make switching to Unix > mode a sane choice, you have to decide: > > a) Will you build SQLite in Unix mode locally, and administratively > ensure that there is no attempt to mix native Windows and Cygwin > users of a single SQLite DB? Or: > > b) Will you accept that the current impure Windows mode build has > its plusses and minuses, and accept the former happily and cope with > the latter? Yes, we have to accept the minuses we can't easily fix, but this one, we can can. Porting the Unix-mode temporary file logic to the Windows build seems workable enough.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
