Wayne Bradney wrote:
> 1. when shared cache is enabled, all reads are serialized,

Yes.

> I guess I MUST use a file-backed database to get concurrent reads,
> even though I don't need the persistence and don't want to take the
> I/O hit.

If the in-memory database works, you do have enough memory for the data,
so you could rely on the OS file cache to keep the data in memory.

If you don't trust the OS, you could put the DB on a RAM disk (like
ImDisk).


Regards,
Clemens
_______________________________________________
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlite.org
http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users

Reply via email to